Kullanıcı1233
Kıdemli Üye
- 19 Tem 2011
- 4,371
- 12
October 13, 1307-ANKARA
Intelligence Gathering Techniques
Every state, institution and organization has open and secret intelligence gathering methods. Embassies in foreign countries are centers of information gathering about that country. Domestically, Open Society organizations which are non-governmental organizations work for intelligence organizations. However, the role and importance of the media in intelligence activities is huge. Academicians are information gathering staff through a scientific meeting organized under the name of symposium, panel and conference. Artists also act as mediators in entertainment activities such as concerts. The will to manage in countries of strategic importance is in deep state construct and subsidiaries.
Deep structures and subsidiaries; If they don't gather effective intelligence about that country, neither a political staff can come to power nor the dissidents can be liquidated in that country. Decision makers and intelligence agencies always carry out an active attempt to use journalists, academics and businessmen. They take an active role in lobbying activities with assignments in holdings. Decision makers decide to keep journalist under control, So they defletc the information about that person. Journalist, diplomats and academics can meet the foreigner intelligence officer who is just like non-governmental organization representative.
You can't see most of these conversations in the news. The problem is sharing secret informations. People can be used as agents and used for their purposes. If Journalist, academist or civil society member is spying, they called "informant". Journalists do similar work with agents (intelligence-gathering) but they don't hide it. they make news and reflect it.
They write very little of what they know because flow of information must continue. They can also transfer the information in different ways, for example they can write a book. There is concern about recording in Civil-Military state bureaucracy, large companies, effective institutions and organizations. Sometimes, this situation is reflected consciously in interviews. Sometimes it isn't reflected consciously because it makes the person feel comfortable. They can open and clear attitude towards people's possible reactions. It is unclear how some of them got to the top positions and it is doubtful how some of them got the title without perform a duty. Others can use a sensitive, poignant and baffled tone of voice. They can boast because they are very well connected people.
Some people take care to give a mysterious atmosphere in their speech, some people act as if they are ignorant. They can give fake smiles. Some people try to give confidence but
Some people speak encrypted, some people strive to be perceived as someone who is effective and offering solutions. some try to be perceived by the other party as if it were a very important. Sometimes, they say "we will follow your advice" because they want to reflect the reassuring image.
Sometimes when they meet with the person, they say "Actually, we are not here to discuss this issue." They say "We are talking to everybody who are intellectual, democratic, journalist who don't hesitate to say their opinions, politicians, unionists. So we want to meet you." Sometimes they say "You are the best, you are the most effective deep academician, journalist. We have been following you for a long time. So your answers is very important for us. We would be very pleased if you answer our questions clearly and don't share them with anyone." They are being tried to create an intimate atmosphere in meetings. In work environments, we can acquire healthy information from people around us who we are aware of or not, we can observe and analyze their behaviors.
source: https://www.turkhackteam.org/sosyal-muhendislik/1101683-istihbarat-toplama-teknikleri.html
Translator: dRose98
Intelligence Gathering Techniques
Every state, institution and organization has open and secret intelligence gathering methods. Embassies in foreign countries are centers of information gathering about that country. Domestically, Open Society organizations which are non-governmental organizations work for intelligence organizations. However, the role and importance of the media in intelligence activities is huge. Academicians are information gathering staff through a scientific meeting organized under the name of symposium, panel and conference. Artists also act as mediators in entertainment activities such as concerts. The will to manage in countries of strategic importance is in deep state construct and subsidiaries.
Deep structures and subsidiaries; If they don't gather effective intelligence about that country, neither a political staff can come to power nor the dissidents can be liquidated in that country. Decision makers and intelligence agencies always carry out an active attempt to use journalists, academics and businessmen. They take an active role in lobbying activities with assignments in holdings. Decision makers decide to keep journalist under control, So they defletc the information about that person. Journalist, diplomats and academics can meet the foreigner intelligence officer who is just like non-governmental organization representative.
You can't see most of these conversations in the news. The problem is sharing secret informations. People can be used as agents and used for their purposes. If Journalist, academist or civil society member is spying, they called "informant". Journalists do similar work with agents (intelligence-gathering) but they don't hide it. they make news and reflect it.
They write very little of what they know because flow of information must continue. They can also transfer the information in different ways, for example they can write a book. There is concern about recording in Civil-Military state bureaucracy, large companies, effective institutions and organizations. Sometimes, this situation is reflected consciously in interviews. Sometimes it isn't reflected consciously because it makes the person feel comfortable. They can open and clear attitude towards people's possible reactions. It is unclear how some of them got to the top positions and it is doubtful how some of them got the title without perform a duty. Others can use a sensitive, poignant and baffled tone of voice. They can boast because they are very well connected people.
Some people take care to give a mysterious atmosphere in their speech, some people act as if they are ignorant. They can give fake smiles. Some people try to give confidence but
Some people speak encrypted, some people strive to be perceived as someone who is effective and offering solutions. some try to be perceived by the other party as if it were a very important. Sometimes, they say "we will follow your advice" because they want to reflect the reassuring image. Sometimes when they meet with the person, they say "Actually, we are not here to discuss this issue." They say "We are talking to everybody who are intellectual, democratic, journalist who don't hesitate to say their opinions, politicians, unionists. So we want to meet you." Sometimes they say "You are the best, you are the most effective deep academician, journalist. We have been following you for a long time. So your answers is very important for us. We would be very pleased if you answer our questions clearly and don't share them with anyone." They are being tried to create an intimate atmosphere in meetings. In work environments, we can acquire healthy information from people around us who we are aware of or not, we can observe and analyze their behaviors.
source: https://www.turkhackteam.org/sosyal-muhendislik/1101683-istihbarat-toplama-teknikleri.html
Translator: dRose98
